barrier certificate
- North America > United States > Missouri > St. Louis County > St. Louis (0.04)
- Europe > Hungary > Budapest > Budapest (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Karlsruhe Region > Heidelberg (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Fuzzy Logic (0.61)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.49)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.47)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.69)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.49)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > Michigan (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.49)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.47)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Fuzzy Logic (0.41)
BarrierBench : Evaluating Large Language Models for Safety Verification in Dynamical Systems
Taheri, Ali, Taban, Alireza, Soudjani, Sadegh, Trivedi, Ashutosh
Safety verification of dynamical systems via barrier certificates is essential for ensuring correctness in autonomous applications. Synthesizing these certificates involves discovering mathematical functions with current methods suffering from poor scalability, dependence on carefully designed templates, and exhaustive or incremental function-space searches. They also demand substantial manual expertise--selecting templates, solvers, and hyperparameters, and designing sampling strategies--requiring both theoretical and practical knowledge traditionally shared through linguistic reasoning rather than formalized methods. This motivates a key question: can such expert reasoning be captured and operationalized by language models? We address this by introducing an LLM-based agentic framework for barrier certificate synthesis. The framework uses natural language reasoning to propose, refine, and validate candidate certificates, integrating LLM-driven template discovery with SMT-based verification, and supporting barrier-controller co-synthesis to ensure consistency between safety certificates and controllers. To evaluate this capability, we introduce BarrierBench, a benchmark of 100 dynamical systems spanning linear, nonlinear, discrete-time, and continuous-time settings. Our experiments assess not only the effectiveness of LLM-guided barrier synthesis but also the utility of retrieval-augmented generation and agentic coordination strategies in improving its reliability and performance. Across these tasks, the framework achieves more than 90% success in generating valid certificates. By releasing BarrierBench and the accompanying toolchain, we aim to establish a community testbed for advancing the integration of language-based reasoning with formal verification in dynamical systems. The benchmark is publicly available at https://hycodev.com/dataset/barrierbench
- Africa > Middle East > Morocco > Casablanca-Settat Region > Casablanca (0.04)
- North America > United States > Colorado > Boulder County > Boulder (0.04)
- Europe > Germany (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Missouri > St. Louis County > St. Louis (0.04)
- Europe > Hungary > Budapest > Budapest (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Karlsruhe Region > Heidelberg (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (0.94)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.69)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.49)
Data-Driven Safety Verification using Barrier Certificates and Matrix Zonotopes
Oumer, Mohammed Adib, Alanwar, Amr, Zamani, Majid
Ensuring safety in cyber-physical systems (CPSs) is a critical challenge, especially when system models are difficult to obtain or cannot be fully trusted due to uncertainty, modeling errors, or environmental disturbances. Traditional model-based approaches rely on precise system dynamics, which may not be available in real-world scenarios. To address this, we propose a data-driven safety verification framework that leverages matrix zonotopes and barrier certificates to verify system safety directly from noisy data. Instead of trusting a single unreliable model, we construct a set of models that capture all possible system dynamics that align with the observed data, ensuring that the true system model is always contained within this set. This model set is compactly represented using matrix zonotopes, enabling efficient computation and propagation of uncertainty. By integrating this representation into a barrier certificate framework, we establish rigorous safety guarantees without requiring an explicit system model. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in verifying safety for dynamical systems with unknown models, showcasing its potential for real-world CPS applications.
- North America > United States > Colorado > Boulder County > Boulder (0.14)
- Europe > Germany > Bavaria > Upper Bavaria > Munich (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Republic of Türkiye > Ankara Province > Ankara (0.04)
Barrier Certificates for Unknown Systems with Latent States and Polynomial Dynamics using Bayesian Inference
Lefringhausen, Robert, Hanna, Sami Leon Noel Aziz, August, Elias, Hirche, Sandra
-- Certifying safety in dynamical systems is crucial, but barrier certificates -- widely used to verify that system trajectories remain within a safe region -- typically require explicit system models. When dynamics are unknown, data-driven methods can be used instead, yet obtaining a valid certificate requires rigorous uncertainty quantification. For this purpose, existing methods usually rely on full-state measurements, limiting their applicability. This paper proposes a novel approach for synthesizing barrier certificates for unknown systems with latent states and polynomial dynamics. A Bayesian framework is employed, where a prior in state-space representation is updated using input-output data via a targeted marginal Metropolis-Hastings sampler . The resulting samples are used to construct a candidate barrier certificate through a sum-of-squares program. It is shown that if the candidate satisfies the required conditions on a test set of additional samples, it is also valid for the true, unknown system with high probability. The approach and its probabilistic guarantees are illustrated through a numerical simulation. Ensuring the safety of dynamical systems is a critical concern in applications such as human-robot interaction, autonomous driving, and medical devices, where failures can lead to severe consequences. In such scenarios, safety constraints typically mandate that the system state remains within a predefined allowable region. Barrier certificates [1] provide a systematic framework for verifying safety by establishing mathematical conditions that guarantee that system trajectories remain within these regions.